SEND US AN EMAIL

DISCLAIMER: If you send a lawyer or law firm email through this service, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via this email service. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties. Super Lawyers will not retain a copy of this message.

Highlights

Verdicts/Settlements

Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency v. Tower Music City II, LLC($30.4 million jury verdict - eminent domain)

Flowers, et al. v. Hillyer, et al.($12.8 million verdict - breach of fiduciary duty)

Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center Associates($11.2 million verdict - fraud)

Tower Acton Holdings, LLC v. Los Angeles County Waterworks($10.1 million verdict - breach of contract)

Huntington Beach Chrysler Jeep, Inc. v. AM General($5.4 million verdict - breach of dealer agreement)

Strother Film Partners v. European American($4.5 million verdict - breach of contract)

Winchester - Wesselink, LLC adv. Van Loon($4.3 million verdict (including $2.5 million in punitive damages) plus over an $1,000,000 in fees and costs - LLC member breach of fiduciary duty)

Arrowhead v. Arrowhead S&L($3.2 million verdict - breach of contract)

HWB Automotive Group, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.($3.1 million verdict - fraud)

Crosson v. Premier Van Lines($2.9 million verdict - fraud)

Rancho Vista Development Company v. Richards, Watson & Gershon($2.5 million verdict - breach of fiduciary duty)

Surf City Auto Group v Van Cleave et al($2.4 million RICO jury verdict)

Kalypso LP v. [CONFIDENTIAL-Fortune 500 Company]$2 million jury trial verdict in favor of Kalypso

John Doe Investor v. BKCG Client, et al.(Obtained complete defense verdict on $1 million fraud claim, as well as complete indemnity award from escrow company on cross-complaint)

Shah v. Yu(Breach of contract for sale of business. Complete defense on complaint against client, and nearly $300,000 verdict on cross-complaint)

Ultimo v. Citylights Commercial Lending Group Inc. Appellate reversal($214,431.84 in fees awarded, not including fees awarded on appeal of over $45,000)

Ralphs adv. Williams: Defense verdict on racial harassment employment claims seeking over $2 million

Ralphs adv. Vincent: Defense judgment on Summary Judgment before trial, plus costs awarded to employer (later upheld on appeal)

EFC v McAllister: Defense of $3 million claim for alleged breach of development contract for proposed reality television show

Fairchild Industries v Taylor: Defense of multimillion-dollar malicious prosecutor claim for law school classmate

Riteaid v. Mariners Mile Gateway: Successfully defended $30 million claim for breach of contract for a large shopping center construction/lease agreement. Court dismissed Riteaid's case during jury trial. All fees and costs were ultimately awarded to BKCG's client.

Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. Mariners Mile Gateway, LLC185 Cal.App.4th 1050 (2010)

Kumar v. Yu201 Cal.App.4th 1463 (2011)

HWB Automotive Group, Inc. v. Nissan Division of Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.45 Cal. App. 4th 1663 (1996)

NCAA v. Tarkanian10 F.3d 633 (9th Cir. 1993) and 795 F. Supp 1476 (D. Nev. 1992)

Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center Associates235 Cal. App. 3d 1220 (1991)

Waranch v. Gulf Ins. Co.218 Cal. App. 3d 356 (1990)

White Papers

https://www.bkcglaw.com/Firm-News/

Contact Us
Share: